Create is the incorrect Word

U.S. Foreign Policy gave rise to ISIS. The pullout of Iraq was actually a kicked out. So, Iraq is partially responsible for the rise of this terrorist group. After the mission accomplished of destroying Libya, some of the terrorists moved to Syria. Some time in 2014, these terrorists from Syria and the leftovers of al-Zarqawi’s terror group joined hands. And we have that famous Toyota trucks scene in summer of 2014. Introducing ISIS to the world.

The “elephant in the room” is President Obama’s decision to withdraw US troops from Iraq for purely political purposes. This resulted in the rise of ISIS.Without an iota of doubt " YES" but How? Through covert means to fight it's war by proxy. This mind less organisation was created financed and armed by making use of fault lines among Muslims. Thomas L Friedman written in NYT's column" America does not want war with Islam but wants war within Islam" Is not it enough or I further substantiate my answe?

• No, the Illuminanti did. The future New World Order is in control now. They control all world events, wars, financial collapes, and overthrow of governments. Ever hear of the Rothschild family? Well they own 90% of all the world banks including the U.S Federal Reserve. And you thought you were a real citizen in your country.
• ISIS is created out of the other Islamist movmeents such as Al Queda and Boko Haram.  The fact is there is a pervasive and global death cult in Sunni Islam and ISIS is just ONE such expression of that.
  We can’t take the responsibility away from the greater Islamic world.
  Now,  with the collapse of Iraq and then Assad of Syria also lost power it did create an environment for a very thuggish element to enter.  The US can accept a good bit of responsibility for Iraq.  But not Syria.
  So without ISIS or some expression of extreme fundamentalist Islam  there probably would have been crime organizations step in and set up house.
• No, the US did not create ISIS. They created themselves, largely on the basis of the lie that Shrub II used to invade Iraq, the subsequent bungling of both the elective war and the so-called nation building that ensued. Obama wanted to end the war and the occupation, but he has found out that the forces of death and destruction are very powerful and well outside the reach of a community organizer. Something similar, albeit on a much smaller scale, is happening in Chicago, much to Obama's dismay.
  Nobody knows why the US started, and continues to maintain all of this warmaking. Obviously, our military toy industry has gained financially from the mayhem, and the MIC is owned by politically connected insiders, who have demonstrated since at least Vietnam, that they have a multi-generational power over the warlike direction that our country is taking.
  The American population will continue paying for all of this war making, since the majority seems to have concluded, roughly summarizing, that war taxes are a relatively small price to pay for the war being waged abroad, not at home.
  Still, the question, why elective war and not elective peace, has not been answered at all by the politically correct speech which dominates the online discussion in the country. Note that PC speech is not just about which bathroom people use, it's also about the desirability of war making and the illogical justification for that war making. PC speech is one of the divisive tools that separate people from agreeing on what the US should be doing.
  People pretend to knowledge about evolution, but in the world of social engineering for different purposes, the most powerful tool of our corrupt leadership is divide and conquer. Again, social engineering covers way more topics than, say, gender studies.
  Anyhow, with the chaos in the ME, ISIS has found a fertile ground to grow in. Notice how our vaunted war machine has been effectively stymied, although there is some indication that, after clearing; holding and building could be the avenue for peace, economic freedom and order in the ME. When our civilian and military leaders tell each other the truth about the facts on the ground, and when they agree on a logical solution to those pressing problems, then maybe they will find and implement a solution.
  In the meantime, ISIS will work assiduously to finish the stated goal of Bin Laden, who sought to destroy our country, which is probably the best thing that humanity has created so far. Our next President may brag about their experience or their secret plans, but they will find that their words have no power, unless they describe reality accurately, and institute actions to help bring about world peace.
  Hard not to close with a sarcastic remark:
• We merely provided the environment and many weapons and personnel unwittingly in our idiot policy in Lybia championed by the supposed most qualified to be president, having failed as Sec State.
  ISIS was a fringe group with few followers in Iraq. But the Arab Spring turned to nightmare by US in Lybia proved a better recruiting environment including many rebels trained and armed by us.
  Proof once again that our huge and massively beyond our defense needs military merely gets us thinking we can do whatever we want, turning hope into disaster and a world more hateful toward us.
• of course, the USA did not create ISIS, which is an expression of Saudi Wahhabi Islam and received start up money from the Saudis. ISIS uses the same strategy modeled by Mohammed in his conquest of Arabia, albeit with modern weapons. Muslims have been waging exactly the kind of merciless war ISIS is waging now since Mohammed led them in attacks on caravans and cities 700 years ago.
  This is how Muslims conquered the Middle East, by beheading the men and taking the women as sex slaves. It’s how they conquered a big chunk of India. It’s how they swept across North Africa into Spain. It’s how they conquered parts of Italy and all of Sicily. It’s how they murdered their way through the Byzantine Empire into the Balkans.
  And, this, is how the Muslims think they can conquer the world.